Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:07:08 -0700
From: Tom Stermitz
Subject: Re: [Tango-L] Musicality. What is it?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
I have a simple description. Admittedly, you can find more complicated explanations:
Musicality is when Movement Energy Corresponds to Musical Energy.
Energy is still a fuzzy, undefined concept, but it includes various
aspects of movement such as speed, force, size, suspension,
acceleration, lift, grounded-ness.
So musicality is about adjusting your physical movements to go with
the music in a pleasing (again undefined) manner.
To teach it, you have to provide examples of musicality in the
exercises. The goal is to offer enough varied examples, that people
can ultimately learn it how it feels in the kinesthetic sense.
So, for example, I teach brand new beginners to walk with musicality
by matching their short elements to the musical phrase. Tango is built
on four plus four equals eight walking beats. Initiate movement
(compression and accelerate or surge) on the one or five, and come
together stationary on the four or eight (suspend, momentum = zero).
I'm very deterministic, and really insist on beginning at one and
ending at four.
Wooden? Yes at first, but at least they are wooden WITH the music
instead of walking woodenly and aimlessly around the room.
The value here is that when movement energy corresponds to musical
energy for these 4+4=8 steps, then they "FEEL" right, the leaders are
more confident, the followers learn about their musicality (i.e. how
they respond through the connection), and that all adds up to bringing
people closer to kinesthetic awareness (i.e. achieving musicality
through intuitive learning).
On Nov 30, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Igor Polk wrote:
> Following Steve's thoughts,
> I have deepen more into that, and to my surprise have found that I can not
> really define what people understand under the term "Musicality".
> I can not say what it is. I know that dancing supposed to be with music.
> And I believe I myself dance musically too ) But on a logical side, or
> rather sociological side I am confused.
> If it is so common, can one define what "musicality" is?
> What most people understand under "musicality"?
> So if one say: "This is a musicality lesson" what people expect?
> Those who come and those who do not?
> Another question is how to develop it.
> Igor Polk
My first thought upon reading this, perhaps obvious, is that "musicality" can be expressed differently, elegantly, eloquently by different people. Indeed, the same couple, dancing to the same song, should, in theory, express different musicality when dancing to that same song on different nights. That is, going with the theory that Tango is an improvised dance.
Some people obviously have "nailed" their musicality - especially on the "demo" and "performance" videos we all watch on YouTube. Some of this, I am sure, comes from practice, practice, practice. I am also sure that much of it comes from listening to tango music over and over - in effect, memorizing a song. There may be a certain spot where the rhythm and melody make it good to do traspie ochos - and a leader may do these in this spot every time he dances to a song.
Speaking for myself, I know I have difficulty being "musical" to a song I have never heard before. I had this problem in the early months of my tango - I didn't know what was coming next. This problem was solved by listening to tango music almost exclusively for over two years now.
I don't really reach any conclusions here - no real "deep tango thoughts" - except that musicality in and of itself is a fairly deep subject. My only conclusion is that good musicality is "a good thing" and that we should all strive to be better with our musical interpretations of a song, and the music in general.
Oh, this just popped into my head - "musicality" does not mean pumping (leader) or flapping (follower) your arms to the music. I hate that - it's not tango. Don't do it. Cuz I said so.